Posts Tagged ‘Occupational safety and health’

This business model was pioneered by Nike and adopted by others including Apple: companies ‘produce’ only their brand and people in lower-wage countries can do all the work. The brand companies shows themselves time and again to be disinterested in what happens on distant production lines until there’s a problem.

Adidas has been under pressure for some time for trying to dodge redundancy entitlements owed to workers in their Indonesian supply chain whose actual employer skipped out of the country. Their tight-fistedness earned them a spotlight at the London Olympic Games.

Now we have details of more problems. The information below details serious health and safety problems at one Chinese factory supplying Adidas.

From Rena Lau at Globalization Monitor:

One of TaylorMade-Adidas golf drivers’ suppliers – Dynamic Casting (Guangzhou) is responsible for the suffering of at least 69 workers, who have contracted Hand-Arm Vibration (HAV thereafter) disease. HAV is a non-curable disease which comes from the use of hand-held power tools and is the cause of significant health problems including painful and disabling disorders of the blood vessels, nerves and joints.

Victim's hands

After our investigation, we found that Dynamic Casting has several violations of China Laws and regulations.
I.            Dynamic Casting has been using substandard polishing machines which exceeded the maximum permitted level required by the National Standard on Occupational Health for a long period of time.
II.          Dynamic Casting failed to notice the hazardous factors of vibration units to workers.
III.        Dynamic Casting refused to send some workers for medical examinations.
IV.        Dynamic Casting forced workers to sign confidential agreement, which requires them to give up all their legal rights, before giving them compensation. Workers complained that the agreement is not a fair deal.
V.          Dynamic Casting unreasonably dismissed 4 affected workers and refused to reinstate two workers until today.
VI.        Dynamic Casting holds back part of the compensation of these 4 workers unless they agree to resign.

According to Adidas Group, they came to know the first cases of HAV disease in Dynamic Casting on late May 2010. Adidas only helped Dynamic Casting to up a timeline to provide medical examination and compensation in patches but not pushed Dynamic Casting to execute the plan.  Therefore, until today, still several workers were not sent to have medical examinations. This shows that Adidas Group does not take occupational and health issues seriously. It is shame for their statement on its website that “Every employee must have a safe working environment. Nothing less is acceptable.” Adidas Group claimed that Adidas SEA audits/ visited Dynamic Casting regularly. In fact, Adidas could not identify any HAV case through their audits. Thus workers working at Dynamic Casting have been always exposed in risky health condition. As the brand company of Dynamic Casting, Adidas Group has unavoidable responsibility to compensate the workers as it is negligent to protect workers from possible hazards.

Based on these facts, we demand:
I.            Adidas make sure all affected workers with HAV receive immediately comprehensive medical examination and compensation demanded by workers.
II.          Adidas set up an Occupational Hazards Victim Fund immediately to compensate all victims with HAV.
III.        Adidas launch a full and immediate investigation on tracking the full number of workers affected by HAV diseases along supply chain in China.

We sent out a full report on Dynamic Cast case to Adidas on 25th September and demanded a full reply from Adidas but until today, we have not received Adidas’s full explanation on the case. Thus we have reason to believe that Adidas may shirk its responsibility on solving the case immediately.

Therefore, we urge you to take action with us in order to support those HAV workers in China.

Suggested Action:
Sign the online petition addressed to the Adidas group expressing your concern about the 69 workers suffering from HAV disease.

Related posts:

I would have just tweeted this video link but it needs a little explanation.

Here is yet another example of supply chain water-muddying. I’m guessing you’ve never heard of Perfect Gem & Pearl Manufactury Company [sic]. They are a Hong Kong-based jewellery wholesaler, exporting worldwide.

This video tells the story of several employees from the company’s factory across the border in Huizhou, Guangdong, who contracted silicosis due to inadequate health and safety protections. A group of their family members travel to the company’s headquarters in 2005 to confront them about it. Their case was pursued by advocacy group China Labour Bulletin and each of the families received about US $40,000 in compensation.

Who knows how many thousands more receive no such assistance!

(If you want to skip right to it, this section of the video begins at 1:28)

Video credit: Asia Monitor Resource Centre

Story source:

Related posts:

Zafirs-treball2

We may be witnessing a watershed moment in India’s labour history.

Advocacy groups in India (all of them home-grown) have pushed for some time to obtain justice for victims of silicosis. This disease is caused by inhalation of dust without protective breathing equipment and causes sufferers to endure constant pain.

It’s sadly very prevalent today in countries lacking high health and safety standards. One industry where it is a problem is in making sandblasted jeans (covered previously). Another is gem-cutting. One small town of  Gujurat state numbers 108 silicosis widows out of its population of 9,000 people. Usually these widows are compelled by economic need to follow their late husbands into the same work. This one village also counted 30 orphans who have lost both parents to the disease in this way.

Unfortunately solution via legislative fiat is not as easy as it sounds. To begin with, the country’s occupational health & safety laws only apply to specific, named industries: mining, manufacturing, ports and construction. That alone wouldn’t be so hard to redress but the majority of India’s workforce is in the informal sector (92% according to the Ashoka website) meaning that laws directed at employers will have no effect on them. Gemstone cutting, for example, is an industry based out of home workshops.

It’s been a long, convoluted journey to get anyone to take action on this issue.

Firstly there was a reporting problem. National figures under-estimated the prevalence of silicosis. Nation-wide – as in other nations – silicosis was being reported as tuberculosis. Public interest advocacy was pursued and successful litigation in the Delhi High Court compelled Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) hospitals to accurately measure the disease’s incidence. Also the National Human Rights Commission started accepting complaints relating to silicosis.

The next step was to litigate for an actual right to compensation. This too was successful however the court, foreseeing the complexities of implementation, asked the state governments to legislate on the matter. To date, one has and two haven’t. Negotiations continue but the governments really have nowhere to run on this issue. It seems workers are on the cusp of securing a historic entitlement.

Even once this is achieved, a further issue is deciding who will pay the insurance premiums and setting up an framework that ensures that the body holding the funds sticks to its purpose and does not simply become a source of funds that gets used for political convenience. ESIC, the insurer for the organised sector, currently runs a surplus of $900 million which suggests either their premiums are too high or they are sitting on a lot of unsettled claims. Activists will tell you it’s the latter.

Meanwhile, the people cutting the gems we see in our fine jeweler’s shops continue to die of this preventable disease.

Reblogged from stop samsung - no more deaths!:

The Occupational Diseases of Electronics/Semiconductor Industry in South Korea
based on the information collected by SHARPS
Update as of March 5th, 2012

(The numbers mean victims and deaths among them respectively)

Total: 154, 61 (i.e. 154 victims found with occupational diseases; 61 deaths)

Samsung Semiconductor: 85, 30
Samsung LCD: 16, 7
Samsung mobile phone and other electronics: 11, 7…

Read more… 128 more words

Very timely as we've heard this week that Samsung has become the world's number 1 manufacturer of smartphones, outselling Apple 3 to 2. They haven't had a fraction of the attention Apple has had in the last two years.
Workers' Memorial Day poster Pray for the dead...

Workers' Memorial Day poster Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the living. - Mary Harris "Mother" Jones (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

What gets measured, gets done.

April 28 is commemorated worldwide as a memorial day of workers killed on the job.

Health and safety provides a stark example of the gulf between the workplace entitlements enjoyed in the developed world compared to the developing world. Not only are safety standards so much higher, after decades of lobbying, but it is comparatively so much easier to show an employer’s liability and thus access some form of remedy.

A forthcoming report co-published by Asia Monitor Resource Centre (AMRC) and Asian Network for the Rights of Occupational and Environmental Victims (ANROEV) draws attention to some stark realities:

  • Globally, occupational disease is a more serious problem than occupational injury, causing four times as many fatalities.
  • One reason disease receives less attention is that it is less visible; deaths occur quietly at home, usually some time after cessation of duties, instead of publicly and dramatically at work. Also once a person stops work their contact with their union (if they belonged to one) usually ceases too.
  • Another significant reason is under-reporting. The workplace death figures that many nations report to the ILO / United Nations are impossibly low. The reason is not that they are being intentionally evasive, they just don’t allocate the resources to measure the problem. In the Philippines for example, the government employs 235 labour inspectors to monitor 800,000 workplaces.

This is a limitation of the CSR approach to labour rights. Until such time as the world becomes much more transparent than it currently is, good intentions and flowery prose aren’t enough to improve people’s rights. A watchdog of some kind is needed, preferably a democratic union but at the very least some kind of impartial monitoring agency. If official statistics don’t show that there is a problem, it’s easy for officials to simply dodge the issue.

(To be continued. Next: Samsung’s Health and Safety record)

Related posts:

Lobster Trap

Lobster Trap (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I’ve started reading Conor Woodman’s recent book, Unfair Trade. Once finished, I’ll post a full review, however it’s already given me some food for thought.

In the first chapter, Conor explains the perils of lobster diving as practised near Bilwi, Nicaragua. The locals dive many times per day in total ignorance of the risk brought about by such frequent decompressions.

Lobster trapping would be a less hazardous alternative but for the locals, the cost of entry is out of their league (about $1,500: 50 traps at $25-30 a piece).

The hapless divers tried to strike to improve their conditions but their customer, an intermediary food processing company, stared them down. The only other lever that can be pulled are the CSR commitments of the companies at the other end of the supply chain, such as Red Lobster restaurants. Even assuming that a ban on dive-caught lobster is helpful, Conor quickly illustrates how it is impossible to know the origin of any particular lobster and no one has set up any serious form of monitoring.

Just when it seemed like a lost cause, enter microfinance.

Yes it will certainly be better if, in the medium-term, the divers can secure some enforceable right to collective bargaining however if you want to assist people get out of the poverty trap you can do so today by making a loan through Grameen FoundationKiva or a similar organisation. It makes the difference between the likes of Conor’s guide, Wally, having some kind of self-determination and being stuck in a vicious cycle of low wages and poor equipment.

The only criticism I’ve heard of microlending is one study which found that people who received funds easily were less inclined to take care of it. I’m not convinced that this is a widespread issue though.

You won’t see the labour movement promoting this as a solution, which is fair enough since collective bargaining would give the Miskitos the leverage to improve their lot on a widespread basis. However you have to be realistic about how attainable that is in Nicaragua in its present state of economic development. In the meantime, concerned individuals can at least “do something” to give real assistance.

Related posts:

Reblogged from stop samsung - no more deaths!:

Every year an international vote is held for the most shameful corporations, to expose what social and environmental damage the corporate world brings.

Please support the Samsung workers and their families by voting for Samsung as the worst company in this poll by Public Eye

http://www.publiceye.ch/en/vote/samsung/

Read more about the Public Eye Awards here

http://www.publiceye.ch/en/about/

North 7700 Series Half Mask Air-Purifying Resp...

Image via Wikipedia

I much prefer stories like this: Problem identified, swift action, sensible company response, workers’ lot improved.

It is fiddlier but this kind of engagement creates a better result for everyone than a straightforward boycott or publicly lecturing the company.

Recently PUMA agreed that it would work to improve specific shortcomings in the Cambodian factory of its supplier Huey Yuen.

It first became apparent that there was a problem in April when over 100 of the factory’s employees were taken to hospital for fainting in a single day.

PUMA’s sourcing policy is quite clear about the company’s intention that its suppliers maintain labour standards but, as we have seen before, that is no guarantee that it happens at ground level. To the company’s credit, it was Puma who requested a full investigation, which was conducted by the monitoring group Fair Labor Association (FLA), of which Puma is a member.

The FLA in their report found numerous shortcomings that went well beyond the immediate cause of the fainting spells (poor ventilation). They found that excessive work hours and poor chemical handling/storage practices also contributed. While there, they also discovered other practices in breach of laws and standards:

  • Counting sick leave as part of annual leave
  • Not providing special leave
  • Placing workers on rolling contracts rather than making them permanent employees
  • Unexplained wage deductions
  • Many other health and safety shortcomings, e.g. insufficient supply of drinking water, no fire evacuation plan and machinery lacking protective shielding.
PUMA accepted all the findings and developed a remediation plan in conjunction with Huey Yuen that includes a process to verify its implementation. It includes an undertaking to:
  • Meet the standards in PUMA’s Code of Conduct pertaining to health and safety, forced labour, compensation, grievances and minimum work age
  • Ensure no one works more than 60 hours per week including overtime
  • Develop an OH&S management plan
  • Meet OH&S standards particularly those for handling and storage of chemicals, including provision of personal protective equipment
Bravo, PUMA!
As a result, the workers lives are improved, the company avoids legal liabilities and consumers hold the brand in higher esteem; everyone wins! Now if only everyone were as far-sighted…

Links:

Anyone remotely interested in workers’ rights in the developing world should get this book! Because it is self-published by Globalisation Monitor it does not appear in Amazon and probably few people in the big developing economies have seen it. It is really easy to get a copy – GM sells it for a song or you can simply download it in PDF format off their website.

Clearly this is not a book written to make a profit; it’s been written because the story is just so extraordinary and needed to be told.

The book describes the appalling neglect of the operators of the Gold Peak battery factory in Huizhou in China’s Pearl River Delta Manufacturing area, whose workers suffer cadmium poisoning after coming into direct contact with the poisonous chemical. The workers largely self-organise to find justice, bypassing the official union and going directly to the authorities and to the press. Only very late in the game do they receive support from groups across the border in Hong Kong. It is all rather tidy: The owners of Gold Peak and their major customers are in Hong Kong, only a few dozen miles away from the factory.

I finished the book feeling upbeat for the future of China’s workers. Injustice transcends cultural barriers, and they weren’t going to take it laying down.

The site management had poor health and safety controls from the beginning. Rather like big tobacco, they did not respond to it and tried to duck the issue when workers began to realise something was wrong. For a considerable time workers attempted to obtain cadmium blood level tests only to have the results altered or not released at all. At one point the factory owners even go so far as to conspire with local hospital officials to thwart people attempting to have tests from a third party.

Not directly relevant but one snippet was a revelation for me and may be for other Western readers: Did you ever wonder how China’s one child policy is enforced? It is done through the employer. The paperwork associated with employment includes family planning permits(!) Anyone who has more than one child suffers demotion or dismissal. This is why people in rural areas are less affected – they don’t work for registered employers, they just work their own land, thus the Central Government has no means of interfering.

Astonishingly the mainly female workforce are undeterred by management’s continued ducking and dodging, first striking and then presenting their case to all who will listen including several ministries in Beijing. Their case attracts media attention and thus the assistance of Globalisation Monitor, who organise direct action against Gold Peak and its chairman.

Gold Peak protest postcard

Protest postcard addressed to GP chairman Victor Lo

While GM’s involvement was helpful I was pleased to see that the most effective action occurs when the company is taken to court (in Mainland China, not Hong Kong) and many of the workers receive compensation settlements. It may not be well known outside the country that China actually has comprehensive health and safety laws – they just don’t have many occupational lawyers! The struggle continues though, with many workers still uncompensated, however I’m heartened that it didn’t endwith them being “rescued” by rich-world NGOs. They are finding their own path.

I’ll finish with an extract that I was particularly touched by. It doesn’t relate to the cadmium issue per se but speaks volumes about daily life in the factory:

Just after I put on the face mask given to me by the line supervisor, I saw that my workmate sitting across from me was crying. I was shocked and asked her what was wrong, but she just kept crying and didn’t say a word. Then a workmate nearby told me what had happened.

After SARS broke out in 2003, we were each allocated two 3M masks per week by the line supervisor. When this workmate got her mask, she found it was a little too tight and tried to loosen it, but the tie broke. She asked the line supervisor to trade it for another one, but the line supervisor said, “I don’t have any extras. Go ask the general line supervisor for another one.” The general line supervisor was a well-known grouch, so the workmate was afraid to ask for a new mask. Later, the general line supervisor passed by, saw that she had not started her machine and asked why. When the workmate said that the tie to her mask was broken, the general line supervisor yelled at her, “How could you be so careless! Do you realize that these masks cost money? And you think you can just waste them!” The workmate then started crying. I felt bad for her, went over to wipe off her tears, and said, “Don’t cry over this. If you cry, people will look down on you. Let me see if I can take care of it for you.” I went over to the general line supervisor and said, “Ling, would you do me a favor and exchange this for a new one?” The general line supervisor looked at me and said with a sigh, “Look, I can’t do anything about it. You know the higher managers are stingy with the masks – the line supervisors get one mask every four days.” I said, “Well, you shouldn’t be so harsh. We’re all migrant workers here. You don’t have to act so severely.” Later, the general line supervisor went to console the workmate for a while. As for the mask, I came up with a solution – we made a hole in the edge of the mask and strung it together with a piece of elastic.

Earlier post:

Memory Lines sculpture in Sydney's Darling Harbour

Lost to workplace accidents

Today, 28 April, is designated as the Workers’ Memorial Day by the International Labour Organisation (ILO).

There are over two million fatal workplace accidents around the world each year, many of them sadly preventable. 100,000 die of asbestos-related illnesses alone.

Services are being held around the world to remember those who have lost their lives to workplace accidents.

I attended the one in Sydney. The peak union body here, Unions NSW, has done a fine job of elevating the day above partisan and sectarian divisions. The service was co-presided over by a rabbi, imam, priest and minister. State Government Ministers from the right-leaning Liberal Party and their counterparts from the left-leaning Labor Party were in attendance. Unions and industry groups were both in attendance.

The commemoration was held before the ‘Memory Lines’ sculpture in Sydney’s Darling Harbour. The sculpture is located on the site where Australia’s first steam mill was constructed in 1813, powering a saw mill, grain mill and foundry. Symbolically it is the birthplace of Australia’s industrial revolution. (Despite its proximity to Sydney’s Central Business District, Darling Harbour was an industrial area right up until the early 1980s.)

The emotional focus of the service was the placing of flowers and mementos on the sculpture by families who had lost loved ones to workplace accidents in the previous year. It was very difficult to watch, like attending several funerals at once, however to turn away would be to turn away from the reality. Deaths at work are not statistics, they are the faces above and many more.